posted Aug 14, 2011 2:51 PM by MOA Announce
The State and Federal Government don't get
it. We are in a situation like a non-competitive company facing
disaster. When this happens a Company implements a crisis plan that usually
includes these key points: 1) Get everyone to brutally face the reality of the
situation. 2) Eliminate entitlement attitudes and put all jobs at risk. 3)
Dramatically cut costs, restructure, sell non-critical assets. 4) Implement
major productivity targets and meet them or be fired. 5) Get back to the core
business and eliminate all investments for the future. None of this is being
done by the Minnesota or Federal Governments. Its basically Business and
Politics as usual. The Federal Government has 18 levels of management. A
typical multi-billion dollar company has 6 or 7 levels. How can Politicians
argue that spending and structure can not be dramatically cut? We need to
prioritize all spending by the core purpose of Government which is to protect
individual rights. Nothing more and nothing less. The crisis we are in is
best summarized by this quote: " A mixed economy is a country in the process of
disintegration, a civil war of pressure-groups looting and devouring one
another" This quote was from Ayn Rand 45 years ago in Capitalism: The Unknown
Ideal.
|
posted Aug 14, 2011 2:38 PM by MOA Announce
[
updated Aug 14, 2011 2:42 PM
]
The following LTE was sent to the Wall Street Journal in regards to the article linked below:
I agree with Mr Brooks' points in "The Debt Ceiling
and the Pursuit of Happiness". This is a battle for the survival of Western
Civilization. The fundamental question is who owns your life?Is it the State, the Church or 51% of the Voters? Until we fully
understand that "Your life belongs to you" and can defend the moral basis of Individual Rights and Capitalism, we will
continue to sink into Statism.Every time Freedom
compromises with Statism, Freedom and Capitalism lose.Ayn Rand forecasted our current crisis in 1965, she said "A mixed economy
is a country in the process of disintegration,a civil
war of pressure-groups looting and devouring one another" ("The Obliteration of
Capitalism, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal")We can no
longer sit on the sidelines. Get grounded in Ayn Rand's Philosophy and join the
fight. The Debt Ceiling and the Pursuit of Happiness http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903554904576460753316043800.html
|
posted Apr 29, 2011 7:11 AM by MOA Announce
[
updated Apr 29, 2011 7:13 AM
]
Part of the debt crisis is the difficulty of conceptualizing a $1.6 trillion deficit. As a benchmark, the total profit in 2010 of all Fortune 500 companies was $391 billion. It is absolutely amazing that the deficit is 4 times the total profit of the 500 most successful USA companies.
There is no way to balance the budget without drastically cutting spending. The real debate needs to be what is the purpose and role of government. We need to return to the original purpose of our founding fathers and our constitution which is the protection of individual rights. This is the standard to which all spending needs to be measured. Continuing to pursue an agenda of "Social good" or Social justice" will bankrupt this great country.
|
posted Apr 20, 2011 6:15 AM by MOA Announce
[
updated Apr 20, 2011 6:26 AM
]
Get out your Bicycles President Obama's energy
policy sounds very similar to his economic policy: "We should be
asking ourselves what mix of policies will lead to a dynamic free market
and widespread economic security ... we should be guided by what
works."(Obama 2006)
The false
premise of both is that government regulations, interventions and
subsidies will create a solution thru a "dynamic free market" -
Whatever that means.
As part of the Recovery
Act, $80 billion was spent on energy fixes. Government solutions
have jumped from ethanol to solar and wind power to electric vehicles to
now natural gas vehicles. Any real free-market solutions have been
stifled by EPA's abuse of the clean air act in declaring that the carbon
dioxide that we exhale is a dangerous gas that must be
regulated.
If the government would
get out of the way with regulations and excessive tax structures the free
market will find all the energy solutions we need.
If we keep going the way
we are, get out your bicycles. That may be the
transportation solution of choice. If only the EPA allows all the
dangerous exhaling.
|
posted Apr 20, 2011 6:15 AM by MOA Announce
The purpose of our
founding fathers was not to "Put country before self" as the writer
claims but exactly the opposite.
Our founding fathers put in place a Constitutional Republic for the
purpose of defending individual rights. ( Not a Democracy of majority rule)
The writer's argument is that our success depends not on hard work and/or
ability but on "luck". This dangerous theory more fully
developed by John Rawls in "A Theory of Justice" is this:
We are born in the USA to parents of means based only on luck, therefore:
1) Apologize for your individual success, 2) Re-distribute wealth and 3)
Apologize to the world for the success of the USA
Sound familiar? It is the position of our current Government. |
posted Apr 20, 2011 6:12 AM by MOA Announce
I feel the same anxiety
and fears as (writer) in his letter "What is there to be afraid of?
Well...."
I also agree that if you
can correctly identify the cause you can fight it.
This is not about a fight
for who is going to be the next president but it is a fight for the
survival of western civilization. The direction of our decline is to
some sort of a totalitarian state or to another dark age.
What is being
assaulted are our individual rights which depend on our political freedom
which depend on our economic freedom.
The assault began about
200 years ago with the philosopher Immanuel Kant. His subjectivist philosophy
and his assault on reason has permeated our total culture to the point
that the moral standard is now "whim" and the argument is no longer
about right or wrong but how to get away with it.
The letter's
subtitle of " The country is in peril, and there's not much that one
person can do about it. But surely someone, somewhere, can help" sounds like
it came right out of Atlas Shrugged. Ayn Rand's answer to
that was "This is John Galt speaking" and a 50 page speech
of the moral crisis of our time. This book has been rated as the second
most influential book on people's lives for a reason. It was written in
1957. Just change the character's names and it could of been written in
2011.
The best news that I have
heard in years is that the movie Atlas Shrugged Part 1 is being released
on Tax Day April 15th.
This will raise the
consciousness that there is something drastically wrong with our culture.
Don't give up hope. The tea
party movement, the discussion of the principles of our founding fathers, tax
rallies, Scott Walker's stand in Wisconsin, the release of Atlas
Shrugged are all good signs. There are no collectivist solutions.
Only individuals can fight the battle. Hopefully many more will join in
the fight armed with a proper philosophy. |
posted Apr 20, 2011 6:11 AM by MOA Announce
[
updated Apr 20, 2011 6:27 AM
]
Dollars and Sense I think we are becoming
desensitized to numbers being thrown around about the Government. During
the budget debate it struck me as odd how $39 billion in tax cuts was
trivialized as not being significant.
I looked up the
profits of the fortune 100 companies for 2010. $39 Billion is the
total yearly profits of 64 Companies. ( Company 36 to 100). After
working 37 years in business I know how difficult it is to create $1 Million in
profit let alone $1 Billion in profit. I am amazed at how $39 Billion (the
equivalent wealth of 64 companies) is discounted like it is nothing. It
really puts context to the problem of finding over $1 Trillion in spending
cuts.
The other numbers that
surprised me is that there are now 22 million government employees earning
40% more than the private sector in salary and benefits. To fund these
government costs would require the total tax revenue of 124 million
private sector employees if the average tax rate is 25%. There
currently are only 111 million tax payers in the USA. Something is drastically
wrong if all of the income taxes of the productive private sector is consumed
by government employees producing nothing.
|
posted Apr 19, 2011 7:46 PM by MOA Announce
[
updated Apr 20, 2011 6:18 AM
]
Letter written by Syvia Bokor to her congressman. She has given us permisson to share it here. Dear Senator Udall
Thank you for contacting
me. I am very concerned about the Administration's health care bill and
strongly urge you to vote against it.
I understand that
like the "stimulus package," Congressmen have not read the bill
but are expected to vote for it. You might want to read some of it before
you decide on it. In effect, it transforms this country into a
socialist state. I am not exaggerating. I am appalled that the
United States Congress will even momentarily consider this bill.
I will certainly NOT
vote for any Congressman who sides with Obama on this egregious "health
care" bill. And I will encourage everyone to do the same.
It has become a truism
that government health care is hazardous to one's health. This being the
case, it is no wonder that Mr. Obama exempts every congressman and his staff
from his "health care" bill.
Sincerely,
Sylvia Bokor
cc: to about 450
individual citizens |
posted Apr 19, 2011 7:45 PM by MOA Announce
[
updated Apr 20, 2011 6:20 AM
]
“I
have often wondered at the smugness with which people assert their right to
enslave me, to control my work, to force my will, to violate my conscience, to
stifle my mind -- yet what is it that they expect to depend on, when they lie
on an operating table under my hands? … Let them discover the kind of doctors
that their system will now produce. Let them discover, in their operating rooms
and hospital wards that it is not safe to place their lives in the hands of a
man whose life they have throttled. It is not safe, if he is the sort of man
who resents it -- and still less safe, if he is the sort who doesn't." --
Dr. Hendricks in Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged.
Dear Doctor
My name is________. I have been a patient of yours in the past. I am a private
citizen who regularly purchases health care services. I do not represent any
political group.
I am writing to you because I am deeply concerned that a socialized medical
plan will be imposed on the American citizens in the near future. I am morally
opposed to this because socialized medicine will be destructive to doctors’
medical practices and harmful to patients. It is not the role of government to
guarantee health care for citizens anymore than it is to guarantee a house or a
car or a job.
Doctors and patients should be free to enter into a contract for medical services
that mutually benefits both parties without interference form government
bureaucrats. Attempts by Canada and Great Britain, in trying to provide
“cradle-to-grave” universal coverage, have resulted in out-of–control costs and
reduced quality of health care. This is not what I want for our country.
I have had numerous conditions treated by very good doctors. I know the
importance of being able to choose a doctor I trust and who I think is
well-qualified to help me and to be free to see a doctor when I think it
necessary. I do not ever want a bureaucrat making those decisions for me.
I have enclosed two items. The first is a copy of “Health Care is Not a Right”,
a powerful statement on the immorality of socialized medicine by Leonard
Peikoff, Ph. D. The other is by Richard Ralston, “Take a Stand for the Rights
of Physicians”. They are important statements that will aid in the fight
against socialized medicine.
I urge you to join me in this fight against socialized medicine. I am committed
to preventing the passage of any government health care plan and will work my
hardest to succeed. But it is doctors and other health care professionals whose
voices need to be heard. Your freedom is as much at stake as the patients.
To fight this it must be fought the right way or the battle will be lost. It
must be fought on a matter of principle, that socialized medicine is immoral,
that slavery is immoral. It must be fought on the principle of individual
rights. Doctors must stand up and say that they have a right to their own life,
their own liberty, and their pursuit of their own happiness. Nothing could be
more important for the future of the United States of America. This is a life
and death issue—literally!
Sincerely,
For more information, please see these web sites:
Americans for Free Choice in Medicine:
http://www.afcm.org/
Freedom
and Individual Rights in Medicine: http://www.westandfirm.org/
Citizens Council on Health Care (St. Paul, MN): http://www.cchconline.org/aboutus.php3
Association
of American Physicians and Surgeons, Inc.: http://www.aapsonline.org/ |
|